Showing posts with label Department of Defense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Department of Defense. Show all posts

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Another Government Agency in Distress

From: The American Legion Magazine, June 2106

More than medicine
By Joseph J. Frank


Until the land mine went off, it was a pretty routine assignment. I was directing a truck loaded with sandbags to a bridge site at Tam Ky, in what was then South Vietnam. The road from base camp to the river had been swept for mines, but the truck swerved left, off the main path. There was an explosion, but I didn’t hear it. The next thing I remember is lying flat on the ground, sensing my legs were still in the air. A medic was immediately upon me, pushing painkillers through my skin, to go along with numbing shock. Strange thoughts entered my mind. Someone was giving me last rites. Was I dead? No, I did not think I was dead. Then I heard the beat of Huey blades in the tropical air. 

I will never forget the date. It was Jan. 14, 1968, 48 years ago – the height of the Vietnam War. I had begun that day as a strapping young soldier in the Army’s 39th Engineer Battalion (Combat). It was the last morning I would rise and feel my feet hit the ground beneath me. 

I came back to the United States paralyzed from the chest down, a T4-5 paraplegic. The hardest part of a spinal injury, for many of us, is psychologically accepting the reality that no matter how hard we try, we’re never going to get up and walk again. The human brain is not easily convinced of this and continues, almost involuntarily, to attempt to solve a problem for which there are not yet any medical answers. 

For me, this new and different life began at the Hines VA Spinal Cord Center in Chicago. There, I had doctors and counselors who understood not only my condition but my context. Healthy soldier one day and paralyzed veteran the next, I had suddenly returned to the United States to begin the yearlong rehabilitation from an injury in a war that most Americans misunderstood or hated. Some would look at me and see an illustration of political viewpoints I did not necessarily share with them. 

In a ward with 32 other paralyzed veterans I learned to get dressed in the morning, take care of myself, operate my wheelchair, keep my upper-body muscles strong and drive a vehicle without the use of lower limbs. I also learned what it means to have health-care services specific to my status as a veteran, delivered in the company of others who have served in uniform. As a young veteran in need, I realized that VA care is a cherished benefit reserved only for those of us who pledged our lives to defend our nation. It’s something we get in return for what we have given.

As the VA privatization movement rattles through Washington heading into the fall elections, I think back to that year I spent at Hines. After I got used to my wheelchair, I started helping other paralyzed veterans in the ward as some had done for me when I arrived. I made several discoveries that first year of major adjustment, and those discoveries have guided my career as a champion for veterans and people with disabilities alike. 

I discovered, for instance, that veterans need caregivers who understand the post-military journey, whether we are looking for relief from post-traumatic stress disorder, trying to figure out a new prosthesis, hunting for a job, filing a claim, buying a house or getting checked for hepatitis C. As an American Legion member, and later as a counselor and service officer in the St. Louis VA system, I also discovered why it’s important to be both a constructive critic and a tireless advocate of VA health care. We address the system honestly and demand improvements when needed because VA health care belongs to us, the veterans who use it. Too often today, I find that the biggest supporters of VA privatization are not VA patients at all. Many are not even veterans.

Too often, veterans’ criticism of VA has been misinterpreted as condemnation. And our calls for change and reform within the system have been erroneously translated into a perceived demand for its transfer to the private sector. The American Legion has supported the 2014 Choice Act and its provisions only as a temporary measure for veterans whose VA facilities are unreasonably distant or overbooked. The Legion opposes permanent use of non-VA providers, as well as expansion of vouchered care to the private sector, for a number of relevant economic reasons, including lower average cost per patient – but there’s much more to it than that.
More importantly, VA consistently outperforms other providers in terms of patient satisfaction and quality. That was certainly the case for me in VA’s spinal cord program, which is superior. A VA health-care provider is far more likely to know where to turn for answers on claims applications, disability ratings adjustments, or college and career help. VA health care is more than medicine. It’s a network of people – providers and patients alike – who care about veterans in ways non-VA medical practitioners can’t be expected to understand, let alone provide. Why would we ever want to take this benefit – a health-care system that understands the context of our lives as veterans and can help us in multiple ways – and hand it off to private providers whose quality probably ranks lower and cannot fully understand our needs and the services available to meet them? Outsourcing is only preferable when veterans have no other choice, such as those who live in rural areas distant from VA facilities.

I was honored to serve on the presidential committee of people with disabilities that brought into existence the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which improved the lives of millions and continues to do so. Not only did the ADA open doors and make upper floors accessible to people who use wheelchairs, it changed perceptions. I remember vividly that, in 1968, children were often frightened by wheelchairs. Today my grandkids want to ride on mine. My work on the ADA, and its success, proved that revolutionary positive changes can be accomplished even when dealing with the federal government, and greater understanding can be achieved on a bigger scale about people outside the average U.S. demographic, like those of us who use wheelchairs and military veterans.

The year I was elected national commander of The American Legion, Congress passed the Veterans Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, which opened up VA to all who honorably served our nation. Priority groups were established to ensure that those with the greatest needs and service-connected conditions would move to the front of the line should demand exceed capacity. As demand grew and capacity did not, today’s access problem understandably arose. The movement to expand privatization because we haven’t solved the access-demand problem seems to suggest that veterans don’t deserve the quality care we fought to achieve in our VA system. Now that quality is great, we will need to go someplace else. That’s pretty hard to accept, regardless of your service-connected disability rating.

A couple of years ago, I went back to the Hines VA center, where this journey began. This time, I was on a completely different mission, conducting an American Legion System Worth Saving site visit. The chief of the center met our group there, and he brought with him a yellowed file from 1968. It was mine. In it was a written chronicle from my arrival as a frightened, young and newly discharged soldier whose future was irreversibly changed, through my wheelchair training, weightlifting, psychological counseling and driving lessons. I was carried into that VA facility and I drove away from it, back to my family in Missouri where I would start a new life. I have been independent, happy and productive ever since, with the benefit of great family support. I knew then, from my experience at Hines, that what lay ahead for me wasn’t always going to be easy, but there are ways to solve almost any problem.  

Joseph J. Frank served as national commander of The American Legion from 1996 to 1997. He also worked as a benefits officer for Paralyzed Veterans of America and as a peer counselor in the Robert Woolsey Spinal Cord Center, attached to the St. Louis VA Health Care System. He often speaks at schools and veterans events about his career in advocacy.



Sunday, December 6, 2015


ARMING AMERICA:
So, you’re contemplating “making a bomb in the kitchen of your Mom”?
You may want to reconsider.


As of today, all households in the United States will be issued:
two 9-mm, semi-automatic pistols, a 20-gauge, 

a sawed off shotgun, and an AR-15 automatic rifle. 
The Federal Government has finally come to its senses and expanded the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution to make this Federal issue mandatory.
All the above weapons are manufactured inside our borders. The 9-mm pistols come with laser pointers, 


up to 10 x 10-round clips and 2,400 rounds of ammunition.
The sawed off shotguns have extendable stocks, a front-mounted hand grip, up to 10 x 16-round shell canisters, and 1,200 shotgun shells.
The AR-15’s come with a scope, a high intensity spotting light, 30-round clips, and up to 5,600 rounds of .556 ammunition.
Common to all these weapons are appropriate silencers for each barrel.
None of the issued firearms will be “registered” in any way, shape, or form by any Government entity.
The only “registration” necessary will be for those households who refuse to participate in the Program.
The budgeting and procurement of the entire Program will by charged against the National Defense Budget. The quartering and dissemination process will be handled by each State’s Army National Guard.
Households will be documented as having received their one-time issue to ensure that no one household receives more than its share. There will be an optional program, backed by Government vouchers, to help defray the cost of secure storage for the entire package of firearms, accessories, and ammunition.
 This action by the Federal Government will put the rest of the world on notice that the American public is armed in sufficient numbers as to be able to defend any threat of terrorist infiltration. This notice will be hi-lighted by the airing of video showing the free Government family-oriented firearm training at local firing ranges around the Country. Firearm training will be offered to anyone starting at the age of twelve. The one-time cost of hardware acquisition and delivery will run in the neighborhood of $1.4 Trillion, the one-time storage/secure voucher system will be about $800 Million, and the family training allowance should come in at around $650 Million over 15 years.







Thursday, April 17, 2014

ENGAGING THE ENEMY

- “We have met the enemy, and they is us.”   ~Pogo

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."
~ President George Washington
There is a constant stream of rhetoric coming from many of our elected officials regarding the treatment of our Veteran Community. The sound bites are slick and catchy, and succeed in their attempt to make the general public think our government really takes care of our Veterans when they return to civilian life after experiencing time in a theater of war. The reality of this subject is that our Nation’s Veterans are not getting the sustainable help they need. They need, minimally, the benefits and treatments promised, and they need them now. It is past the time for politicians and bureaucrats, who work for us, to put solid, meaningful actions behind their slick, glossy words.

Our Soldiers do not deserve to be treated like third class citizens upon their return from the war zones and theaters of battle our government so quickly sent them to. They deserve to be treated gratefully, and by a grateful Government. They do not deserve to be toyed with by bureaucrats who seemingly can’t fathom, or acknowledge, the Soldier’s sacrifices. They do not deserve to have the rug pulled out from under them by self-serving, bickering, and unproductive legislators and bureaucrats. They do not deserve to die a civilian with a needle in their arm, or a bullet in their brain, after so gallantly representing the United States of America.

In acknowledging that all politics are local, I have chosen to look at a little slice of America: Nassau and Suffolk Counties on Long Island, New York. I consider these two Counties to be my “home town”, as do most of the 142,000 other veterans who live here. As a percentage of population, we Veterans make up 5.4%; not too far from the National average.

Politicians take a look at a number like 5.4%, and, in forging their election strategies, are willing to ignore such a seemingly insignificant number of people.

There is, however, one small problem for any politician who blatantly minimizes, lies to, and ignores our Veteran population. We Veterans, as a whole, tend to vote at about a 76% rate; unlike the rest of the civilian population that musters a mere 30-35%. We also have an earned distrust of government; after all, it was government that sent us off to fight wars in God-forsaken lands. And, once we got there, it was government that refused to supply us with adequate gear, rolling stock, and allow for proper military strategy. Then, when we got back home, we were promised a package of benefits that weren’t accessible, or weren’t attainable, or were summarily denied. This has been the overriding case since the Vietnam War, and, to Veterans of that era, it is excruciatingly painful and sad to see how inadequately the Veterans of today are being treated. Granted, it is tough cleaning up the human excrement left by war, but that is one of the jobs a Federal government that created the mess is obligated to do.



“A BAND OF BROTHERS”




No one in government seems to be asking the question, “ If the Federal and State governments deliver the services they claim to, then why do organizations like The Wounded Warrior Project, The Soldier’s Project, the PSTD Veterans Association, and all the rest of the 501(c) Service Organizations have a need to exist?” The answer is that they shouldn’t need to exist at all, ever! The government should live up to its promises and pick up the pieces when their Soldiers return home – no matter the cost. Government creates wars; wars create paraplegics; wars create Traumatic Brain Injury; wars create Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; it is government’s obligation to fully and completely take care of the mess they create.

Our government trained us in the ways of waging war. So, having fought enemies of the State, we find it necessary to engage once more in battle. This time, however, the enemy is the State, and as in the past, we will be victorious. I hereby put all politicians who represent my “home town” on notice. This is an election year. You will be hearing from us.

Respectfully, ______________________________

Hutch Dubosque, Vice President
PTSD Veterans Association of Northport, Inc.
PO Box 194
Northport, NY   11768
631-223-6107
www.ptsdveteransassociation.com



Friday, April 4, 2014

Another tragedy at Ft. Hood

submitted to Newsday (Long Island's new
the face of PTSD
spaper) / Op-Ed & Letters to the Editor

First, let’s get one thing very clear. Not everyone suffering from PTSD is a homicidal, psychotic, ticking time bomb. So, I implore the Media, and the Country, to cease and desist in their blanket insinuations that Service members with PTSD are all an imminent danger to Society.

The most recent tragedy at Ft. Hood, Texas, lends further evidence to the premise that the U. S. Armed Forces still have not gotten a grip on the affliction of and personnel struggles with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) [1]. The latest shooting spree in Texas hi-lights the inability of our Armed Forces structure when it comes to dealing with the psychological devastation of this most common malady during and after periods of war.

In this respect, alone, the Veterans Administration Medical System is light years ahead of the Services creating this mess. The United States has been fighting wars, large and small, since its inception. One might rationally deduce that, by now, we would have properly addressed this malady. Our Armed Forces clearly know that PTSD, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), and other mental and psychological illnesses caused by War are very quickly diagnosed and treatable. Although there is no “cure” for the likes of PTSD, there are a number of effective treatment protocols used to lessen the effects and allow our Soldiers to live with it.

This latest shooting at Ft. Hood should never have happened. There exists a very concise set of criteria that determines whether one has PTSD, or not. There is a set of questions that, over the years, has proven to be an accurate test for a clinical diagnosis of PTSD, and this young Soldier should have been diagnosed in the fifteen, or twenty, minutes it takes to run down a set of fifteen questions [2]. The blood of the dead and wounded in Texas is on the hands of our Army and its Medical Corps. for not handling this Soldier in the correct manner.

HUTCH DUBOSQUE, Vice President
PTSD Veterans Association of Northport, Inc.
PO Box 194, Northport, NY   11768
also,
10 Woolsey St., Huntington, New York   11743
                        http://wethepeeps1.blogspot.com


Definition[1]
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health condition that's triggered by a terrifying event. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event.
Many people who go through traumatic events have difficulty adjusting and coping for a while. But with time and taking care of yourself, such traumatic reactions usually get better. In some cases, though, the symptoms can get worse or last for months or even years. Sometimes they may completely shake up your life. In a case such as this, you may have post-traumatic stress disorder.
Getting treatment as soon as possible after post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms develop may prevent long-term post-traumatic stress disorder.
Symptoms[2]
Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms typically start within three months of a traumatic event. In a small number of cases, though, PTSD symptoms may not appear until years after the event.
Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms are generally grouped into three types: intrusive memories, avoidance and numbing, and increased anxiety or emotional arousal (hyper arousal).
Symptoms of intrusive memories may include:
·         Flashbacks, or reliving the traumatic event for minutes or even days at a time
·         Upsetting dreams about the traumatic event
Symptoms of avoidance and emotional numbing may include:
·         Trying to avoid thinking or talking about the traumatic event
·         Feeling emotionally numb
·         Avoiding activities you once enjoyed
·         Hopelessness about the future
·         Memory problems
·         Trouble concentrating
·         Difficulty maintaining close relationships
Symptoms of anxiety and increased emotional arousal may include:
·         Irritability or anger
·         Overwhelming guilt or shame
·         Self-destructive behavior, such as drinking too much
·         Trouble sleeping
·         Being easily startled or frightened
·         Hearing or seeing things that aren't there
Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms can come and go. You may have more post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms when things are stressful in general, or when you run into reminders of what you went through. You may hear a car backfire and relive combat experiences, for instance. Or you may see a report on the news about a rape and feel overcome by memories of your own assault.
[1] http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/post-traumatic-stress-disorder/basics/definition/con-20022540
[2] http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/post-traumatic-stress-disorder/basics/symptoms/con-20022540


Thursday, January 16, 2014

Big money behind war: the military-industrial complex

- I hate to say, “I told you so!”, 

but the truth will always come out



More than 50 years after President Eisenhower's warning, Americans find themselves in perpetual war.
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and has testified before Congress on the dangerous expansion of presidential powers.


In January 1961, US President Dwight D. Eisenhower used his farewell address to warn the nation of what he viewed as one of its greatest threats: the military-industrial complex composed of military contractors and lobbyists perpetuating war.

Eisenhower warned that "an immense military establishment and a large arms industry" had emerged as a hidden force in US politics and
that Americans "must not fail to comprehend its grave implications". The speech may have been Eisenhower's most courageous and prophetic moment. Fifty years and some later, Americans find themselves in what seems like perpetual war. No sooner do we draw down on operations in Iraq than leaders demand an intervention in Libya or Syria or Iran. While perpetual war constitutes perpetual losses for families, and ever expanding budgets, it also represents perpetual profits for a new and larger complex of business and government interests.

The new military-industrial complex is fueled by a conveniently ambiguous and unseen enemy: the terrorist. Former President George W Bush and his aides insisted on calling counter-terrorism efforts a "war". This concerted effort by leaders like former Vice President Dick Cheney (himself the former CEO of defense-contractor Halliburton) was not some empty rhetorical exercise. Not only would a war maximize the inherent powers of the president, but it would maximize the budgets for military and homeland agencies.

This new coalition of companies, agencies, and lobbyists dwarfs the system known by Eisenhower when he warned Americans to "guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence… by the military-industrial complex". Ironically, it has had some of its best days under President Barack Obama who has radically expanded drone attacks and claimed that he alone determines what a war is for the purposes of consulting Congress.

Investment in homeland security companies is expected to yield a 12 percent annual growth through 2013 - an astronomical return when compared to other parts of the tanking economy.

Good for economy?
While few politicians are willing to admit it, we don't just endure wars, we seem to need war - at least for some people. A study showed that roughly 75 percent of the fallen in these wars come from working class families. They do not need war. They pay the cost of the war. Eisenhower would likely be appalled by the size of the industrial and governmental workforce committed to war or counter-terrorism activities. Military and homeland budgets now support millions of people in an otherwise declining economy. Hundreds of billions of dollars flow each year from the public coffers to agencies and contractors who have an incentive to keep the country on a war-footing - and footing the bill for war.



Across the country, the war-based economy can be seen in an industry which includes everything from Homeland Security educational degrees to counter-terrorism consultants to private-run preferred traveler programs for airport security gates. Recently, the "black budget" of secret intelligence programs alone was estimated at $52.6bn for 2013. That is only the secret programs, not the much larger intelligence and counterintelligence budgets. We now have 16 spy agencies that employ 107,035 employees. This is separate from the over one million people employed by the military and national security law enforcement agencies.

The core of this expanding complex is an axis of influence of corporations, lobbyists, and agencies that have created a massive, self-sustaining terror-based industry.

The contractors
In the last eight years, trillions of dollars have flowed to military and homeland security companies. When the administration starts a war like Libya, it is a windfall for companies who are given generous contracts to produce everything from replacement missiles to ready-to-eat meals.

In the first 10 days of the Libyan war alone, the administration spent roughly $550m. That figure includes about $340m for munitions - mostly cruise missiles that must be replaced. Not only did Democratic members of Congress offer post-hoc support for the Libyan attack, but they also proposed a permanent authorization for presidents to attack targets deemed connected to terrorism - a perpetual war on terror. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) offers an even steadier profit margin. According to Morgan Keegan, a wealth management and capital firm, investment in homeland security companies is expected to yield a 12 percent annual growth through 2013 - an astronomical return when compared to other parts of the tanking economy.

The lobbyists 
There are thousands of lobbyists in Washington to guarantee the ever-expanding budgets for war and homeland security. One such example is former DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff who pushed the purchase of the heavily criticized (and little tested) full-body scanners used in airports. When Chertoff was giving dozens of interviews to convince the public that the machines were needed to hold back the terror threat, many people were unaware that the manufacturer of the machine is a client of the Chertoff Group, his highly profitable security consulting agency. (Those hugely expensive machines were later scrapped after Rapiscan, the manufacturer, received the windfall.)

Lobbyists maintain pressure on politicians by framing every budget in "tough on terror" versus "soft on terror" terms. They have the perfect products to pitch - products that are designed to destroy themselves and be replaced in an ever-lasting war on terror. 

The agencies 
It is not just revolving doors that tie federal agencies to these lobbyists and companies. The war-based economy allows for military and homeland departments to be virtually untouchable. Environmental and social programs are eliminated or curtailed by billions as war-related budgets continue to expand to meet "new threats".

A massive counter-terrorism system has been created employing tens of thousands of personnel with billions of dollars to search for domestic terrorists.

With the support of an army of lobbyists and companies, cabinet members like former DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, are invincible in Washington. When citizens complained of watching their children groped by the TSA, Napolitano defiantly retorted that if people did not want their children groped, they should yield and use the unpopular full-body machines - the machines being sold by her predecessor, Chertoff. 

It is not just the Defense and DHS departments that enjoy the war windfall. Take the Department of Justice (DOJ). A massive counter-terrorism system has been created employing tens of thousands of personnel with billions of dollars to search for domestic terrorists. The problem has been a comparative shortage of actual terrorists to justify the size of this internal security system. 

Accordingly, the DOJ has counted everything from simple immigration cases to credit card fraud as terror cases in a body count approach not seen since the Vietnam War. For example, the DOJ claimed to have busted a major terror-network as part of "Operation Cedar Sweep", where Lebanese citizens were accused of sending money to terrorists. They were later forced to drop all charges against all 27 defendants as unsupportable. It turned out to be a bunch of simple head shops. Nevertheless, the new internal security system continues to grind on with expanding powers and budgets. A few years ago, the DOJ even changed the definition of terrorism to allow for an ever-widening number of cases to be considered "terror-related".

Symbiotic relationship
Our economic war-dependence is matched by political war-dependence. Many members represent districts with contractors that supply homeland security needs and our on-going wars.

Even with polls showing that the majority of Americans are opposed to continuing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the new military-industrial complex continues to easily muster the necessary support from both Democrats and Republicans in Congress. It is a testament to the influence of this alliance that hundreds of billions are being spent in Afghanistan and Iraq while Congress is planning to cut billions from core social programs, including a possible rollback on Medicare due to lack of money. None of that matters. It doesn't even matter that Afghan President Hamid Karzai has called the US the enemy and said he wishes that he had joined the Taliban. Even the documented billions stolen by government officials in Iraq and Afghanistan are treated as a mere cost of doing business.

It is what Eisenhower described as the "misplaced power" of the military-industrial complex - power that makes public opposition and even thousands of dead soldiers immaterial. War may be hell for some but it is heaven for others in a war-dependent economy.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and has testified in Congress on the massive counter-terrorism budgets and bureaucracy in the United States.
*The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

Source:


http://www.aljazeera.com/Media/ver2/Images/1pximage.png

Sunday, January 12, 2014

“Recent al-Qaida push stresses LI Iraq War vets” – NEWSDAY


My friend, Martin Evans, is keeping the flame alive, as he reports on the plight of Long Island’s Veteran population. His most recent article, below, helps to give some insight to the feelings of frustration and anger that our OIF & OEF Veterans are currently experiencing. The old guard, Viet Nam Veterans, had a similar feeling of despair, frustration, anger, and mistrust after the fall of South Viet Nam in 1975. I am honored with the opportunity to walk among some of our newly returned Veterans, and I am equally saddened by what they are going through in their battle to re-enter civilian life. As Mr. Evans has reported before, the suicide rate for our younger Veterans is climbing at alarming speed. It is now true that the primary cause of death for Soldiers and Veterans is suicide, not being in battle. Thank you Martin, for keeping this subject on the radar.
I sincerely hope that the United States of America comes to its senses, and stops making Veterans.

Originally published: January 9, 2014 7:53 PM
Updated: January 9, 2014 9:27 PM
By MARTIN C. EVANS (click)
martin.evans@newsday.com

   Photo credit: Newsday / John Paraskevas | Francis Romanitch,
   a Marine Corps reservist who helped pacify Anbar Province
   when he served in Iraq. (Jan. 9, 2014)

The al-Qaida takeover of parts of Iraq's Anbar province, where about a third of American troops killed in the war perished, has left area Iraq War veterans bitterly wondering what their sacrifice was all about.

"It's disheartening," said Francis Romanitch, 28, a Marine Corps reservist who served in the Anbar city of Ramadi in 2004 as Marines fought door-to-door 25 miles away in Fallujah.It’s like seeing the Japanese flag flying over Iwo Jima 10 years after World War II," said Romanitch, of Babylon.

Last week, al-Qaida-linked forces overran parts of Fallujah and Ramadi, commandeering police and military facilities, and setting up armed checkpoints. The White House has ruled out resending U.S. troops -- who withdrew from Iraq in 2011 -- but is providing the Iraqi government with arms.

Beginning in 2004, Anbar, a Sunni power base for Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein before his capture, became the scene of some of the bloodiest confrontations during the war.

After insurgents hung the burned bodies of four American contractors from a bridge in Fallujah, U.S. troops that April rooted out opponents during weeks of door-to-door confrontations. But they paid a horrific price, according to historian Richard Lowry, author of the book "New Dawn: The Battles for Fallujah."

"These young Marines -- 19 years old -- went in every building and every room of Fallujah," Lowry told Fox News. "They entered darkened rooms, kicking down doors, never knowing if they would find an Iraqi family hunkered down in fear or an Islamist terrorist waiting to shoot them and kill them. And they did that over and over and over again."

Mental health workers have said witnessing a military collapse can be emotionally traumatic for war veterans regardless of what conflict they fought in.

"It's re-traumatizing, if you will," said Denis Demers, who served as a psychological medic in Vietnam and now counsels veterans at the Suffolk Veterans Service Agency.

In 2004, Michael Posner was stationed in Mosul with a New York National Guard unit when a bomb ripped through a military mess tent, riddling him with shrapnel and killing 14 fellow soldiers. He said watching parts of Iraq slip under insurgent control weighs heavily on him.

"It brings back a lot of memories and flashbacks," said Posner, 43, of Bellport. Feelings of anxiety, depression and anger spawned by his wartime experience for a while pushed  him to abuse alcohol and cost him his marriage.

"I lost a part of my soul over there," he said.

Posner, who since returning from Iraq has helped counsel fellow soldiers suffering from anxiety attacks, said he's recently received phone calls from veterans expressing rage.

"A lot of these guys lost a lot of their buddies and saw a lot of bloodshed," he said. "There was so much work they did, and it's gone to hell."

Scott Molloy, 29, of Kings Park, who served in Afghanistan in 2012, said the feeling of accomplishment he had over there has turned to disillusionment. Molloy has struggled to control feelings of anger and frustration related to post-traumatic stress disorder. He said those feelings have worsened because of the al-Qaeda surge.

"It hits you like a ton of bricks," he said. "You ask yourself, 'Why did I go through all that? Why am I suffering?' "d him to abuse alcohol and cost him his marriage.

Galleries:
(click)Honoring Long Island's veterans 
(click)Military heroes return to Long Island







(click)LI, NYC war casualties
(click)LI troops who died in war