Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Thursday, February 11, 2021

A sixty-five-year impression of what our National government looks like from the street.

 “Money for nothin’ and the chicks for free!”

…..Way too much money!

My first memories of money in government started in the late 1950’s. I will never forget Dwight Eisenhower’s speech warning the Nation of the power behind the Military Industrial Complex. He saw that the number one threat to our democratic way of governance may well come from within. This threat is addressed in the oath to public and military service, in part:

 “…defend this Country from all threats, both foreign and domestic.”

 I hope this sounds very familiar to every citizen of this Nation. We constantly keep a vigilant eye toward threats from the outside. Now, it has become painfully clear that we have to be vigilant to threats from within. Unfortunately for Dwight Eisenhower, the money from the did overwhelm the system and inevitably brought us to “Citizens United”.

 In the 1960’s, dark money from the entire corporate world started strutting its stuff in public. John Kennedy doesn’t get elected without huge donation influx of corporate money. Historically corrupt politicians, like Lydon Johnson, had so many money-related I.O.U.’s that he could get whatever he wanted for his campaign war chest.; and did. Then came the major failure, Dick Nixon. He almost made it for eight years, but all his big money guys went sour on him and out the door he went.

 All the time Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon held office the massive war machine flourished and grew to staggering heights. A ton of “dark” money was turning tides at the voter’s polls. Corporations of all types were more seriously getting in the game of buying a government. The 1960’s fomented a movement of great mistrust of our National government which, by the 1970’s, created drastic reductions in the number of actual voters. Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter bubbled us into the 1980’s. We then got this actor person, Ron Reagan, to take us through most of the 1980’s. There was some serious money involved in National politics at this point. The money continued to flow as G. W. H. Bush lead us out of the 1980’s into the roaring 1990’s. The 1980’s seemed to be a wake-up call to the U.S. voters, as far as huge money donors went. Bill Clinton took the helm and all hell broke lose with big, dark money in politics; lots of it, on both sides of the aisle. Clinton’s only remarkable achievement was his leaving office after two terms with a National Budget surplus. Those that came after him blew the National budgets and deficits to hell in a hand basket.

That took care of the roaring 90’s. Y-2K came and went; nothing to see here – keep moving. G. W. Bush came down from on high aided and abetted by Daddy’s big money donors and took a seat in the White House. That seat wasn’t even warm when the Towers came down and the Pentagon was breached. And, just like that, we were involved in an endless war; one which we are still embroiled 20+ years later. That old Military/Industrial Complex once again reared its ugly head and the Federal government fell into their trap and trance. This group of self-serving corporations and individuals never went away they were simply laying low just waiting to ponce on the U.S. Treasury. The Complex was such a dreadnaught that it immediately plunged the Nation into financial crisis [along with sub-prime mortgages].

 We have elected three presidents since “W”, and money in politics has grown to epic levels with the help of “Citizens United”. Our Nation’s finances have been destroyed almost to the point of no return. If this trend goes on any longer, we will indeed be a third-world Nation. For all the men and women who have put their lives on the line for this Country, this would be the ultimate insult to our dedication to democracy.

 

Sunday, July 19, 2020

WOMEN IN POLITICS

2020 & BEYOND

 

Federal Congressional Branch
Our current viral and chaotic condition shows that mayors, governors, and those in the halls of Congress are going to be our political and fiscal saving grace; not the federal executive branch.

At this point, there are only a handful of men and women doing the right things for us, “We The People”. Washington DC has hung “We The People” out to dry; sold us ALL down the river.

This is NOT a partisan political essay. We are looking strictly at the numbers as they pertain to the ideals of “taxation with no representation”.

How about using the House of Representatives, State and Local platforms as launch pads to give women a lot more access onto our political platforms? We have some
women in elected Local, State, & Federal positions. It is painfully obvious that we need, yes, hundreds more.

Three major questions:
Ø When was the last time a woman started a war?
Ø When was the last time you saw a woman run a State into the ground?
Ø When was the last time you saw a woman bankrupt a city, town, or village?

Let’s look at some numbers.

Women, as a percentage of the population:
§  157.0 million female, (50.8 %)
§  151.8 million male, (49.2 %)

Women in Congress:
Why start with the Congress
of the United States?        
                                                        They control most of the purse
                                                        strings when it comes to
                                                        allocating money & passing Laws.
250%.


As of January 2020, there are 26 women serving in the United States Senate, 17 Democrats, and 9 Republicans, the highest proportion of women serving as U.S. senators in our history. There are 50 Senators, so:
The Senate is properly
represented by women.



Women Governors:





1.         Currently9 women are serving as governors of U.S.    states, along with the Mayor of the District of Columbia Muriel Bowser, and territorial governors Lou Leon Guerrero of Guam and Wanda Vázquez Garced of Puerto Rico. That comes to 53 Governors, and gives women only 16%. We need to increase that number by just over:
300%.

Women Mayors:
(cities over 30,000)
1.         As of September 2019, per the U.S. Conference of       Mayors, of the 1,366 mayors, 300 (22.0%) were        women. We need to increase that number by:
230%.



Who started most wars?

US Has Killed More Than 20 Million People in 37 “Victim Nations” Since World War II. Since the United States was founded in 1776, she has been at war during her 240 (till 2016) calendar years of existence. That means that for 222 out of 240 years – or 93% of the time – America has been at war.

And, still no woman in the Oval Office! 
Are we that stupid?

helpful reference:
Why women don't start wars

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Next, we will have a look at our Judicial System & the Executive Branch as they pertain to women in positions of power.

Tuesday, June 9, 2020

‘From Where I Sit’

                                                            PRELUDE:
I am neither for nor against any organized religion. Everyone has the absolute right to seek his or her spirituality and faith from any quarter they choose. I am simply pointing to a possible scenario involving religions on a global scale.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ever since the days of the Vietnam War and Watergate, I have had a healthy mistrust in what the U.S. Government has been telling the public on almost every issue that affects us.
                                                                   
Since my teenage years, I have wondered about the “division of Church and State”. The constructors of our founding documents made a clear, unambiguous
statement to keep Church and State separated; mostly due to their past experiences with the English Monarchy/Church, from which they were seceding. My question is how has this provision in our Constitution been increasingly ignored over my lifetime and been allowed to meld into the body politic.   

While I am sure this is not a brand new phenomenon, the blurring of the lines between Church and State has been noticeably growing at a fast pace. I first noticed this in the late 1950’s when Dwight Eisenhower was President and our Nation’s Civil Rights movement started shifting into high gear. Back then, as it is now, it was perfectly understandable that our society was looking for spiritual guidance. Then, in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, The Vietnam Conflict led many young folks toward seeking alternative spiritual guidance. Some folks seemed to find that guidance in sex, drugs, and rock and roll. By the time the 1980’s and the 1990’s rolled in, it seemed like National and Global incidents were coming at us much faster. The 2000’s and 2010’ kept this ball rolling at an ever increasing rate. Now, it’s the 2020’s and World and National events have picked up momentum such that Church is covertly able to infiltrate the State.
   
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

While the Nation has been in constant upheaval here and abroad, our citizenry seemed to be fast losing their trust in a major source of social guidance, the U.S. Government. With that trust center all but gone, folks have turned to forms of organized religion, forms of atheism, and other less traditional means of spirituality to find guidance. Amidst National mayhem and chaos, the erosion of separation of Church and State is in its final stages. This was, and is, going on very much behind the scenes.
Something to seriously ponder:
                                       [Ctrl + click to open hyperlinks]

I invite you to look into The Fellowship Foundation. They are the folks who run the “National Prayer Breakfast” in Washington DC and in over 100 Countries globally (referred to generally as “The Family”). Take a look at the World’s movers and shakers who attend these events. Who, in our Country, invites them (invitation only to the events). I believe that everyone should get some education on this situation to see where this movement is headed.

The National Prayer Breakfast is a yearly event held in Washington, D.C., usually on the first Thursday in February. The founder of this event was Abraham Vereide.[1] The event—which is actually a series of meetings, luncheons, and dinners—has taken place since 1953 and has been held at least since the 1980s at the Washington Hilton on Connecticut Avenue NW.
The National Prayer Breakfast, held in the Hilton's International Ballroom, is yearly attended by some 3,500 guests, including international invitees from over 100 countries. It is hosted by members of the United States Congress and is organized on their behalf by The Fellowship Foundation, a Christian organization. It is designed to be a forum for the political, social, and business elite to assemble and pray together. Since the inception of the National Prayer Breakfast, several U.S. states and cities and other countries have established their own annual prayer breakfast events.
[1]: Getter, Lisa (September 27, 2002), "Showing Faith in Discretion", Los Angeles Times.

History
The origin of the National Prayer Breakfast is traced back to prayer groups with business and civic leaders in Seattle, organized by Abraham Vereide in the 1930's. When he moved to Washington, DC, he established similar groups with members of Congress. In 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower attended a meeting by invitation of Congressmen, Vereide, and Billy Graham. Vereide's successor Douglas Coe and Rev. Richard C. Halverson have also carried leadership roles in organizing the event. A government leader was quoted as saying that the Breakfast and Coe's influence offers foreign leaders access to the President that "circumvents the State Department and usual vetting... that such a meeting would require," and other participants indicated that their purpose for attending was political.[2] Initially called the Presidential Prayer Breakfast, the name was changed in 1970 to the National Prayer Breakfast. Every American president since Dwight D. Eisenhower has participated in the annual event.[3][4]
[2]:  Lindsay, D. Michael (2006). "Is the National Prayer Breakfast Surrounded by a "Christian Mafia"? Religious Publicity and Secrecy within the Corridors of Power". Journal of the American Academy of Religion. 74 (2): 390–419. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfj060ISSN 0002-7189JSTOR 4094038.

Mission Statement -
The Fellowship Foundation's 501(c)(3) mission statement is: To develop and maintain an informal association of people banded together, to go out as "ambassadors of reconciliation," modeling the principles of Jesus, based on loving God and loving others.

You may have thought that Leah Remini’s
expose’ on the Church of Scientology was bizarre.
 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Is Washington DC simply ignoring a major element of our founding documents? Why has religion become so entrenched in our Government even when our Constitution proclaims otherwise? It seems “The Family’s” mission creep has become a sprint. I am beginning to think that Christianity, in some form, is attempting to fortify its ranks for the possibility of another great religious war. Moreover, this is not being done in the Churches. This is being done very quietly in the halls and back rooms of government. After all, what has been behind wars of all kinds for thousands of years? Humankind’s history has been dominated with religious wars; some small, some large, some extremely large.
I have taken note of some current theories on what the next World War may look like. It would not surprise me in the least if World War III is fought exclusively on religious grounds; perhaps, Christianity vs. Islam. For this reason alone, it behooves our Citizenry keep a keen eye on our Federal Government. and what they do in this arena.

Do not let a handful of manipulators and
scoundrels lead us down a very dark hole.



Sunday, May 22, 2016

Another Government Agency in Distress

From: The American Legion Magazine, June 2106

More than medicine
By Joseph J. Frank


Until the land mine went off, it was a pretty routine assignment. I was directing a truck loaded with sandbags to a bridge site at Tam Ky, in what was then South Vietnam. The road from base camp to the river had been swept for mines, but the truck swerved left, off the main path. There was an explosion, but I didn’t hear it. The next thing I remember is lying flat on the ground, sensing my legs were still in the air. A medic was immediately upon me, pushing painkillers through my skin, to go along with numbing shock. Strange thoughts entered my mind. Someone was giving me last rites. Was I dead? No, I did not think I was dead. Then I heard the beat of Huey blades in the tropical air. 

I will never forget the date. It was Jan. 14, 1968, 48 years ago – the height of the Vietnam War. I had begun that day as a strapping young soldier in the Army’s 39th Engineer Battalion (Combat). It was the last morning I would rise and feel my feet hit the ground beneath me. 

I came back to the United States paralyzed from the chest down, a T4-5 paraplegic. The hardest part of a spinal injury, for many of us, is psychologically accepting the reality that no matter how hard we try, we’re never going to get up and walk again. The human brain is not easily convinced of this and continues, almost involuntarily, to attempt to solve a problem for which there are not yet any medical answers. 

For me, this new and different life began at the Hines VA Spinal Cord Center in Chicago. There, I had doctors and counselors who understood not only my condition but my context. Healthy soldier one day and paralyzed veteran the next, I had suddenly returned to the United States to begin the yearlong rehabilitation from an injury in a war that most Americans misunderstood or hated. Some would look at me and see an illustration of political viewpoints I did not necessarily share with them. 

In a ward with 32 other paralyzed veterans I learned to get dressed in the morning, take care of myself, operate my wheelchair, keep my upper-body muscles strong and drive a vehicle without the use of lower limbs. I also learned what it means to have health-care services specific to my status as a veteran, delivered in the company of others who have served in uniform. As a young veteran in need, I realized that VA care is a cherished benefit reserved only for those of us who pledged our lives to defend our nation. It’s something we get in return for what we have given.

As the VA privatization movement rattles through Washington heading into the fall elections, I think back to that year I spent at Hines. After I got used to my wheelchair, I started helping other paralyzed veterans in the ward as some had done for me when I arrived. I made several discoveries that first year of major adjustment, and those discoveries have guided my career as a champion for veterans and people with disabilities alike. 

I discovered, for instance, that veterans need caregivers who understand the post-military journey, whether we are looking for relief from post-traumatic stress disorder, trying to figure out a new prosthesis, hunting for a job, filing a claim, buying a house or getting checked for hepatitis C. As an American Legion member, and later as a counselor and service officer in the St. Louis VA system, I also discovered why it’s important to be both a constructive critic and a tireless advocate of VA health care. We address the system honestly and demand improvements when needed because VA health care belongs to us, the veterans who use it. Too often today, I find that the biggest supporters of VA privatization are not VA patients at all. Many are not even veterans.

Too often, veterans’ criticism of VA has been misinterpreted as condemnation. And our calls for change and reform within the system have been erroneously translated into a perceived demand for its transfer to the private sector. The American Legion has supported the 2014 Choice Act and its provisions only as a temporary measure for veterans whose VA facilities are unreasonably distant or overbooked. The Legion opposes permanent use of non-VA providers, as well as expansion of vouchered care to the private sector, for a number of relevant economic reasons, including lower average cost per patient – but there’s much more to it than that.
More importantly, VA consistently outperforms other providers in terms of patient satisfaction and quality. That was certainly the case for me in VA’s spinal cord program, which is superior. A VA health-care provider is far more likely to know where to turn for answers on claims applications, disability ratings adjustments, or college and career help. VA health care is more than medicine. It’s a network of people – providers and patients alike – who care about veterans in ways non-VA medical practitioners can’t be expected to understand, let alone provide. Why would we ever want to take this benefit – a health-care system that understands the context of our lives as veterans and can help us in multiple ways – and hand it off to private providers whose quality probably ranks lower and cannot fully understand our needs and the services available to meet them? Outsourcing is only preferable when veterans have no other choice, such as those who live in rural areas distant from VA facilities.

I was honored to serve on the presidential committee of people with disabilities that brought into existence the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which improved the lives of millions and continues to do so. Not only did the ADA open doors and make upper floors accessible to people who use wheelchairs, it changed perceptions. I remember vividly that, in 1968, children were often frightened by wheelchairs. Today my grandkids want to ride on mine. My work on the ADA, and its success, proved that revolutionary positive changes can be accomplished even when dealing with the federal government, and greater understanding can be achieved on a bigger scale about people outside the average U.S. demographic, like those of us who use wheelchairs and military veterans.

The year I was elected national commander of The American Legion, Congress passed the Veterans Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, which opened up VA to all who honorably served our nation. Priority groups were established to ensure that those with the greatest needs and service-connected conditions would move to the front of the line should demand exceed capacity. As demand grew and capacity did not, today’s access problem understandably arose. The movement to expand privatization because we haven’t solved the access-demand problem seems to suggest that veterans don’t deserve the quality care we fought to achieve in our VA system. Now that quality is great, we will need to go someplace else. That’s pretty hard to accept, regardless of your service-connected disability rating.

A couple of years ago, I went back to the Hines VA center, where this journey began. This time, I was on a completely different mission, conducting an American Legion System Worth Saving site visit. The chief of the center met our group there, and he brought with him a yellowed file from 1968. It was mine. In it was a written chronicle from my arrival as a frightened, young and newly discharged soldier whose future was irreversibly changed, through my wheelchair training, weightlifting, psychological counseling and driving lessons. I was carried into that VA facility and I drove away from it, back to my family in Missouri where I would start a new life. I have been independent, happy and productive ever since, with the benefit of great family support. I knew then, from my experience at Hines, that what lay ahead for me wasn’t always going to be easy, but there are ways to solve almost any problem.  

Joseph J. Frank served as national commander of The American Legion from 1996 to 1997. He also worked as a benefits officer for Paralyzed Veterans of America and as a peer counselor in the Robert Woolsey Spinal Cord Center, attached to the St. Louis VA Health Care System. He often speaks at schools and veterans events about his career in advocacy.



Friday, February 19, 2016

“CAUCUS - SHMAUCUS”

Over the years, I have really tried to pay attention to the mechanisms that make our style of democracy work. I have learned some things about the process. I have learned to appreciate some other things about the process. One thing, however, that still baffles me is the absurdity of the State Caucus mechanism during a Presidential Election year.
As far as I can discern, this process does nothing; means nothing; and, is, therefore, useless to the overall election of Party Delegates who, in turn, decide who their Presidential candidate will be. Eleven States and two Territories are currently entertain a non-committal system of voicing their electorate’s preferences in the corner of a neighbor’s living room. I understand and appreciate that the fifty States and our Colonial Territories have a need to flex their “individuality” when it comes to their identity. There are many ways States and Territories can do this; making it a useless part of an election cycle is not one of those times. I feel strongly that, in a Presidential election year, there should be certain uniformity to the Primary process and the General Election; do what you want with State and local politics, but the National forum should be uniform. 
[Note: This holds for the Presidential candidates and their election, only. The States and Territories have control over their Federal and Local Representation.; as it should be]

Below are some basic numbers to illustrate just how useless this Caucus thing is.

THE STATES WHICH USE THE CAUCUS SYSTEM INCLUDE
State / Territory
Population
Alaska                
0.73 million
Colorado            
5.3 million
Florida               
19.8 million
Hawaii               
1.4 million
Idaho                          
3 million
Iowa
1.6 million
Kansas               
2.9 million [1]
Maine                
1.3 million
Minnesota         
5.4 million
Nevada              
3 million
North Dakota    
0.73 million [1]
Washington                
7 million
Wyoming           
0.5 million [1]
American Samoa        
0.05 million
US Virgin Islands 0.05 million
0.05 million
[1] The oil and gas industry has undoubtedly increased these population figures, but probably   not enough to make a remarkable difference in their percentage of the total population


THE CAUCUS STATES/TERRITORIES AS A % OF THE U.S. POPULATION
US Population 
322 million
Caucus States/Territories Population 
52.85 million
% of U.S. Population
16.5 %

Why do so few insist on voicing a non-committal preference when the rest of the Country is actually casting votes and going “on record” as to whom they prefer. Let it be that there is a Caucus process in the final decision making process at the Party’s National Conventions.


There are certain special interest Caucuses in the Congress. And, that’s alright; they serve a purpose in those venues. When we vote in any regularly scheduled National, State, or Local election there is no Caucus procedure. So, why do some of us insist on the Caucus process in a Primary situation? It’s stupid and useless in a Primary; get rid of it, please!


 I have some other basic questions about our “election” process, as well. And, believe me, I need some help here.

[These questions are predicated on my belief that our Primary and General Election time span is simply too long. The Primary/Caucus procedure starts on February 1 and continues until the National Conventions in August. This is a full 6 ½ months before the Conventions and 9 months prior to Election Day in November. Why?]

Questions:
1) Why are early Caucus States viewed as a make/break proposition for     candidates?
Ø They logically and rationally do not.
2) Why can’t the entire Delegate assignment procedure be accomplished just prior to the National Conventions?
Ø Two weeks prior would do just fine.
3) Why is our Presidential Election year campaign process a 1 ½-             yearlong proposition? ($$$money$$$)
Ø Three months is a reasonable period; given our twenty-four hour News Cycle.
4) Presidents and Governors have term limits. Why is any other politician different? ($$$money$$$)
Ø They are in business to serve “We The People”. We don’t need career Politicians. They have a very short shelf-life.
5) Could there somehow be an exponential increase in voter                   participation if the campaign season was shortened to three months?
Ø I feel there would be less apathy and a lot more enthusiasm with the voting public.
6)  Could something in the neighborhood of three months create a             “snowball/domino” effect that would see less influence from                   campaign contribution money?
Ø Simple legislation that says, “No!” would probably be enough to snuff out the obscene amounts of money in the campaign cycle.
7)   How do you force the imposition of term limits for every elected         official in the nation; Federal, State, and Local?
Ø Keep it simple, and vote!