As
the United States plies its brand of “democracy” in the Mideast and Persia, the
Church State of Iran is countering with spreading their unique brand of Islam.
It has become painfully evident that the U.S. does not have a clue when it comes
to understanding any other religion forms of Christianity and Judaism. The fate
of all the Mideast, Persian, and neighboring Countries hangs in the balance.
With most of Europe and all of Russia sharing in this demise, the longer this
state of affairs exists, the longer western expansionist tendencies in the
region will last, and the more dramatic Iran’s reaction will be. What is
perfectly clear is that outside involvement in the Mideast and Persia is not
about the oil. It’s not about human rights. It is about the total lack of
understanding of the Islamic religion. This lack of understanding fuels a high
level of fear that the political and corporate driven attempts to bring calm
and peace to the region can’t seem to resolve. In this case, ignorance is not
bliss; it is very dangerous to the world as a whole. There is a solution to all
the turmoil that has been draining the human resources of too many Countries
around the world.
The
solution is three-fold in nature. The first part involves a concerted effort by
all non-Islamic nations to do their best in understanding the true nature of the
Islamic religion. This is not a religion that foments jihad, or any sort of
extreme violence. As religions go, Islam is a very beneficent religion; loving,
nurturing, kind, and forgiving. The second part of the equation involves the
non-Islamic nations understanding and accepting that some folks prefer a Church
State to that of a western style governmental structure. Not everyone wants to
be like the United States; or, Canada, England, Spain, Greece, Russia, China,
etc. Once these two are put into practice, Islamic governments around the globe
will truly feel that they have a place at the table, and they aren’t going to
be targets of colonialism, expansionism, or occupation.
The
third part is a little trickier, but not out of the realm of possibility. This
would be a legal form of State sponsored assassination. The “State” in this instance
would ideally be the United Nations. As a world body, the U.N. should have the
ability to remove singular despots from their perches as Kings, Emirs,
Dictators, Grand Imams, Ayatollahs, etc. The benchmark would not include how a
ruler got into power, but what he did once he assumed that leadership
role. Topping the list of determinants
for assassination would be Human Rights, as describe by the U.N.; not described
by any one member Nation, or private interest group. The U.N. would have the
right to choose the “who, what, when, where, and why” for this action to
proceed. In no way would any corporate influence be allowed to have any weight,
whatsoever, in determining the specific action. Sorry, Dick Cheney. Sorry, Halliburton.
Sorry, Exxon-Mobil.
This
third part, being relative drastic in nature, would necessarily be preceded by
diplomatic efforts to resolve the problem in a predetermined time period. Given
the enactment of this third option, it would only take a few legal
assassinations to let folks know that the world means business when it comes to
peaceful coexistence. In defining “crisis intervention”, this type of action
offers the absolute minimum of collateral damage to people, places, and things.
Certainly, all peace-loving people would agree that lowering the “collateral
damage” quotient is a desirable element in achieving World Peace.
The
current situation in the Near-East and Mideast is not sustainable for very much
longer. The next step will undoubtedly be an escalation of hostile takeovers that
the world has never seen before. The entire quagmire will amount to a “domino
effect” more damaging than that which occurred in Indo-China in the 1950’s, 60’s,
& 70’s; an effect the United States has yet to recover from. And, of
course, what happens to Israel is totally up in the air, as they will be
surrounded by the opposition.