Saturday, November 16, 2013

Town of Huntington, NY...........Part V


OUR TOWN….
SUCH A NICE PLACE TO LIVE AND RAISE A FAMILY.
I was going to rant and rave about Town Hall, again, until I ran across an article in the Village Tattler, by Jeffrey Thompson. I will post a few excerpts from the article and provide a link to the complete article. Mr. Thompson has captured the sentiments that the Town citizens might want to follow. This is all about our tax dollars, aka your money, which is being stolen right out from under us by a corrupt administration in Town Hall. It took me a while to find what I was looking for, and another while to get through it all. What I did find is that our money is going places you wouldn’t imagine in a million years. What follows is a listing of some of the “low-lights” our Town government has given us just in the week since the “head of beast” was re-elected.
Just two days after this year’s election, the Town Council met to vote on next year’s Budget. Heaven forbid the meeting should be well attended! Come on, folks, there should be standing room only at these meetings, and, until there is, our Town government will exercise free reign on spending our money.

From the Budget (short form):
11/8/2013 - Board Approves Petrone’s 2014 Budget Proposal
“The Huntington Town Board has approved Supervisor Frank P. Petrone’s 2014 Operating Budget, a $185.2 spending plan.... By the same vote, the Board approved the $8.8 million Capital Budget”
Two very separate numbers that bring into play the exempting of borrowing in the Capital Budget. This was stated in proposition #5 as being solely for the Sewer District. Don’t bet that you were told the entire story on that one.
“Planned initiatives for 2014 and beyond include: the completion of Coral Park, the reconstruction of the Gerard Street Parking Lot, a new bulkhead at the Halesite Town dock, the construction of a new rowing facility, funding for technology initiatives and for protection of our environment.”
This all comes under the “Capital Expenditures” category, which is separate from the main Budget. I didn’t know that everyone in the Town of Huntington was into rowing. The Gerard St. parking Lot make-over is going to yield perhaps four (4) more parking spaces. Technology initiatives and protecting our environment are gray areas where the spending can be easily hidden from the Public’s view, hence an increased possibility of misuse. I dare anyone to try to find out just who is going to be doing all this “construction”. There exists a past history of “crony-ism” that will probably ensure that, for these projects, the correct construction company gets the job.
“…authorized sending a letter to the Zoning Board of Appeals supporting the Huntington YMCA’s plan for a new building and the construction of new parking facilities on Town land.”
Remember the ballot proposal #7 on the back side of our paper ballots? No? I didn’t think you did. For those of us who did take a peek at the back side of our ballots, the ink wasn’t even dry before the special “eminent domain” kicked in for another expansion of the YMCA (on land the Town owns, or has the developmental rights to).
Here’s another example of the Petrone administration wasting no time exercising that #7 ballot proposal to deed land that the Town owns, or has the development rights to, over to private business instead of the stated public services option.
“The Huntington Station-related resolutions set December 10 public hearings on zoning measures related to two Huntington Station revitalization projects: the Columbia Terrace housing development at Railroad Street and Lowndes Avenue and the possibility of a hotel across the street, as supported by the community in the recently adopted Huntington Station development strategy. If adopted, the resolutions would change the zoning to a more appropriate category for the envisioned 14-unit Columbia Terrace proposal and adjust the zoning on the property that is now a municipal parking lot to allow for construction of a hotel. Sitting as the board of the Community Development Agency, the Board also approved hiring Jeffrey A. Hartman, P.C., for design and engineering services for the Columbia Terrace development.
And, the lack of transparency never ceases to amaze.
“…set a public hearing for 9 a.m. December 6 on a proposed local law that will grant one-time property tax relief for homes damaged by Super Storm Sandy.”
December 6th is a Friday. And, who in their right mind set a 9 AM as a time for a homeowner to grieve on relief of anything? Come on, folks, are they treating this as a joke?
I find it unfortunate that folks in Huntington didn’t have the foresight to check into this before the elections last week. Perhaps, next year (2014) we can get the word out with sufficient lead time to educate the population of Huntington, our “All-American Town”.
                                          Would you buy a used car from this man?

Monday, November 11, 2013

Our Town

Our Town
“Such a nice place to live and raise family”


Election Day, 2013, has come and gone and now is the time for all the citizens of  Huntington Township to come together, hold hands, and sing “koom-by-ya”. If you believe that, I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn (real cheap).


*        The Town of Huntington is located in northwestern Suffolk County, New York. The Long Island Sound forms         its northern border, and Nassau County forms the western border. Huntington was named an All-America City in 2002 by the National Civic League.” [1]
*        The 2010 census indicates that the population of the town is 203, 264. A 2007 estimate indicates that the median income for a household in Huntington was $102,865. The population of Huntington is predominantly young, with over 60% of resident being under the age of 45.” [1]
Villages in the Town of Huntington [1]
·         Asharoken
·         Huntington Bay
·         Lloyd Harbor
·         Northport
 Hamlets in the Town of Huntington [1]
·      Centerport
·      Cold Spring Harbor
·      Commack
·      Dix Hills
·      East Northport
·         Eatons Neck
·         Elwood
·         Fort Salonga
·         Greenlawn
·         Halesite
·         Huntington Station
·         Huntington
·         Melville
·         South Huntington
·         West Hills
                               



It isn’t rocket science to figure out that we live in one of the more affluent areas of the entire Country. Say you assumed an average household of four (4) people that would give you approximately 50,800 total households in Huntington Township. With a total of $102,865.00 a year per household, we are looking at a very large number from which the Town draws its revenues:
            $5,225,542,000.00………………………………………..over 5 billion dollars.
            The Town’s budget for 2014 is $185,200,000.00……close to 200 million.
So, the Town needs about 3.5% of our earnings to function. Why is it then that in a working class neighborhood we are paying almost double (x2) that percentage in Real Estate Taxes to the Town of Huntington Tax Collector? And, guess what? We haven’t even touched all the other revenue streams that the Town relies on; permits & fees, business taxes, State & Federal Funding, etc. We’re not talking highs and lows. We’re talking middle class, average, median income levels per household. It is very apparent that our Town’s tax code has gotten so far out of hand that we are paying an exorbitant amount of money for a set of basic services. Does anyone in this Town ever take even a cursory glance at their Tax Bill? By the way this Town votes every Election Day, I would have to reach the conclusion that only a very few of us know how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide. And, most of those who do seem to end up behind closed doors at Town Hall making deals and spending money that we citizens simply don’t have.

Take a look at the “Referendum” voting from last week. If you actually read these, you would see the length to which our elected officials will go to keep their hands in your wallet.
“1. Do we want casinos?
                        Yes: 1,408,845 | No: 1,052,724 [2]
            2. Do we give disabled veterans additional civil service credit after they have been    
      appointed to a civil service position?
                        Yes: 1,931,932No: 377,972 [2]
            3. For the next ten (10) years, do we want to keep the debt from sewer systems out of
     the Town borrowing cap?
                        Yes: 1,331,389No: 808,552 [2]
            4. Do we want to litigate a bunch of old, disputed land titles in the Adirondacks?
                        Yes: 1,543,486No: 587,456 [2]
            5. Do we want to let NYCO Minerals rights to mine another 200 acres upstate?
                        Yes: 1,128,067No: 995,656 [2]
            6. Do we want to let Judges serve until they are eighty (80) years old?
                        Yes: 911,503 | No: 1,407,189 [2]
            7. Do we want to let municipal fire districts, ambulance districts, police districts and
                library districts to expand on Town owned property?
                        Yes: 105,020No: 58,143” [2]

A majority of these outcomes should be at least a little troubling to the tax payers in this Town. Do we want casinos? Yes, it would be nice to keep a chunk of our gambling dollars here in New York, but don’t believe for a moment that the revenue will go for education, as advertised. Do we want to give disabled veterans a bit of a break? Of course we do, and we should seriously consider doing a whole lot more for veterans. We certainly should be in favor of settling land ownership disputes in upstate New York, and this needs to be done with the Adirondack environment in mind.
Judges are up for mandatory retirement at the age of seventy (70) which is too old by at least ten (10) years, but, no, we don’t want to extend their retirement to eighty (80) years old. That’s a serious “WTF” proposal!

That brings us to #3, #5, and #7.  #3 allows the Town to discount any cost of borrowing for the sewer district from the normal accounting of the Town debt/borrowing cap. This, in effect, allows the Town to borrow more money in each category, thus spending more of the money none of us have. #5 deals with the immediate future of a chemical additive product company that has been allowed to strip-mine in the Adirondacks. It extends their reach into another two hundred (200) acres of pristine forest. Despite promises and contractual liabilities, strip-miming in upstate New York is a problem we can all do without. #7 is another very local, high impact proposition. The Town owns, or has the development rights to, some very attractive properties. By allowing this proposition to pass, we are telling the Town service agencies that they can tie these properties up with minimum stalling and legal tactics for decades. There may well come a time when other uses for these properties are a more definite benefit to the Town’s population. Why would we vote to hand complete and utter stewardship of this land over to our “behind closed doors” political structure?

With the aforementioned 50,800 total households in Huntington Township, we actually turned out a good number of voters last Tuesday; about 30%. Based on past numbers, this is not bad for an off-year election. With this number in attendance, I would have thought that reading might go hand-in-hand with mathematics, and we would finally come to our collective senses and stop the spending spree that the current, old administration gets away with year after year after year. Only the voters have a dog in this fight, and only voters can elect folks to Town positions who will act on our behalf. For too long now we have been hostage to the back room deals, the crony-ism, the behind closed doors, secret, weekend decision making that is going to bankrupt this place we call home. There are alternatives. Pick one, and go with it next time your mark your ballots.

Toe-notes:
            [1] Home  » Towns » Suffolk County » Huntington Township
                                 http://www.longisland.com/town-of-huntington.html

            [2] Statewide and county ballot referendums, originally published: October 17, 2013 3:42 PM
                                Updated: November 5, 2013 8:34 PM, By NEWSDAY STAFF

                                http://www.newsday.com/elections/statewide-and-county-ballot-referendums-1.6273587

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Huntington Pol’s…………….In their own words…………….



                http://www.markcuthbertson.com/
Councilman Mark Cuthbertson was re-elected to a four-year term on the Huntington Town Board in 2009 and has served on the Huntington Town Board since January 1998. Cuthbertson has kept his pledge to put politics aside and be part of a bi-partisanship government that has marked the most significant turnaround in local government on Long Island. Throughout his term, Mark Cuthbertson has voted to reduce and stabilize taxes in Huntington by working with the other members of the Town Board, to place performance over partisanship. In recent years, he has focused on the area of economic development and job creation and has used his background in real estate law to attract several major projects in the Route 110 corridor including Canon USA and Rubie's Costumes. This effort was recognized by the Long Island Business News as the Best Public Private Partnership for 2008. In addition, Cuthbertson has sponsored sweeping environmental legislation to preserve hillside areas in the Town, to promote renewable energy, update code enforcement and to preserve open spaces.
§  A Record of Tax Stability - In the last 4 years town taxes have gone up by less than 1/2 a %. (0.50%) **

















                     Do you find it interesting that it’s the one number they don’t report that 
                 has sky-rocketed out of control? This is yet another straw on the camel’s back.

School tax:
     “State aid may offset Huntington school tax
      Originally published: April 5, 2011 7:57 PM
      Updated: April 5, 2011 8:11 PM
      By DEBORAH S. MORRIS  
deborah.morris@newsday.com
      The restoration of some state aid has Huntington school officials  
      reconsidering the district's proposed 3.5 percent property-tax increase. **



And, from the website, “city-data.com”, comes this little morsel about the increase in the base formula that calculates your Real Estate Taxes

“Originally Posted by rockmusicalways View Post
To the OP... the 09 RAR was .0074……. for 2010 it’s .0083


Read the following, then watch the video, or watch the video, then read the following:

video - right click on "youtube":  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAACFYzU-lU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=OAACFYzU-lU
Published on Oct 9, 2013
Councilman Mark Cuthbertson Pockets $1 Million in Legal Fees from Other Towns While Sitting on the Huntington Town Board
Serious questions have been raised about Huntington Town Councilman Mark Cuthbertson's outside legal practice. He pocketed more than $1 million in fees by representing towns other than Huntington, including North Hempstead, Islip, Brookhaven and Babylon. It appears that Cuthbertson has spent more time representing the citizens of four other towns than his own constituents in Huntington.
*Cutherbtson worked for the North Hempstead Community Development Administration which has a long
  history of scandal. North Hempstead CDA was found guilty of large-scale bid-rigging and bribery in connection with a selected developer. 
*Cuthbertson's Campaign Contributions to campaigns for Non-Huntington candidates totaled more than
  $85,000!
*Cuthbertson represents the Industrial Development Agencies for Islip, Babylon & Brookhaven.
IS THIS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
  *Cuthbertson approved the $2 Million in taxpayer money that Supervisor Frank Petrone used to pay dozens of attorney friends. ***

Produced by
Alternative Media Ops
Long Island, NY
AlternativeMediaOps@gmail.com


.........continuing.................................

               http://www.frankpetrone.com/

Huntington Outrage:
Councilman Calls for Audit, Gets Blasted by Supervisor

When Huntington Town Supervisor Frank Petrone heard that newly elected councilman Gene Cook wanted to the town to audit the books, he attacked the messenger instead of addressing the issue.

"I'm embarrassed for Gene Cook," Petrone quipped after viewing comments made by Cook on a controversial video. In the video, Cook commented about his first 30 days in office and was highly critical of the town's General Services department and the Comptroller's Office. Cook cited various examples of wasteful spending, inefficiencies, redundancy in services and poor communication that he encountered during his first weeks on the job.

Rather than comment on these serious concerns, Supervisor Petrone chose to comment about a joke Cook made, thus ignoring serious problems in Huntington's government. It is the oldest trick in the book, attack the messenger instead of the message.

TO SEE CONTROVERSIALVIDEO right click on "video":   https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=DYSZT2kluv4

All this, and more, embarrasses me when it comes to a discussion of Huntington Town politics. It seems to me that when the “poo” starts getting hurled by politicians, then something is rotten in Denmark (so the saying goes). If politicians can’t, or won’t, answer a question, they simply change the subject and spew oral diarrhea in the form of “non sequiturs”. We all need to see the red flags whenever we witness this subtle practice; some politicians are extremely exemplary in this mode of communication.


      
HEY, HUNTINGTON, WAKE UP!!