Showing posts with label Taxes Corporate Taxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taxes Corporate Taxes. Show all posts

Thursday, January 16, 2014

This is where it all begins.

- Chop the legs out from under “Big Business”, bring them back from la-la land, and this Country’s economy may stand a fighting chance of surviving.

Ten Examples of Welfare for the Rich and Corporations
BILL QUIGLEY FOR BUZZFLASH AT TRUTHOUT

Here are the top ten examples of corporate welfare and welfare for the rich. There are actually thousands of tax breaks and subsidies for the rich and corporations provided by federal, state and local governments but these ten will give a taste.

One: State and Local Subsidies to Corporations. An excellent New York Times study by Louise Story calculated that state and local government provide at least $80 billion in subsidies to corporations. Over 48 big corporations received over $100 million each. GM was the biggest at a total of $1.7 billion extracted from 16 different states but Shell, Ford and Chrysler all received over a billion dollars each. Amazon, Microsoft, Prudential, Boeing and casino companies in Colorado and New Jersey received well over $200 million each.

Two: Direct Federal Subsidies to Corporations. The Cato Institute estimates that federal subsidies to corporations costs taxpayers almost $100 billion every year.

Three: Federal Tax Breaks for Corporations. The tax code gives corporations special tax breaks which reduced what is supposed to be a 35 percent tax rate to an actual tax rate of 13 percent, saving these corporations an additional $200 billion annually, according to the US Government Accountability Office.

Four: Federal Tax Breaks for Wealthy Hedge Fund Managers. Special tax breaks for hedge fund managers allow them to pay only 15% rate while the people they earned the money for usually pay 35% rate. This is the break where the multimillionaire manager pays less of a percentage in taxes than her secretary. The National Priorities Project estimates this costs taxpayers $83 billion annually and 68% of those who receive this special tax break earn more than $462,500 per year (the top one percent of earners).

Five: Subsidy to Fast Food Industry. Research by the University of Illinois and UC Berkeley documents that taxpayers pay about $243 billion each year in indirect subsidies to the fast food industry because they pay wages so low that taxpayers must put up $243 billion to pay for public benefits for their workers.

Six: Mortgage Deduction. The home mortgage deduction, which costs taxpayers $70 billion per year, is a huge subsidy to the real estate, banking and construction industries. The Center of Budget and Policy Priorities estimated that 77 percent of the benefit goes to homeowners with incomes over $100,000 per year.

Seven: The billions above do not even count the government bailout of Wall Street which all parties have done their utmost to tell the public they did not need, they paid back, or it was a great investment. The Atlantic Monthly estimates that $7.6 trillion was made available by the Federal Reserve to banks, financial firms and investors. The Cato Institute estimates (using government figures) the final costs at $32 to $68 billion, not including the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which alone cost more than $180 billion.

Eight: Each major piece of legislation contains new welfare for the rich and corporations. The Boston Globe analyzed the emergency tax legislation passed by Congress in early 2013 and found it contained 43 business and energy tax breaks worth $67 billion.

Nine: Huge corporations which engage in criminal or other wrongful activities protect their leaders from being prosecuted by paying huge fees or fines to the government. You and I would be prosecuted. These corporations protect their bosses by paying off the government. For example, Reuters reported that JP Morgan Chase, which made a preliminary $13 billion mortgage settlement with the US government, is allowed to write off a majority of the deal as tax deductible, saving the corporation $4 billion.

Ten: There are thousands of smaller special breaks for corporations and businesses out there. There is a special subsidy for corporate jets which cost taxpayers $3 billion a year. The tax deduction for second homes costs $8 billion a year. Fifty billionaires received taxpayer funded farm subsidies in the past twenty years.

If you want to look at the welfare for the rich and corporations start with the federal Internal Revenue Code. That is the King James Bible of welfare for the rich and corporations. Special breaks in tax code is the reason there are thousands of lobbyists in the halls of Congress, hundreds of lobbyists around each state legislature and tens of thousands of tax lawyers all over the country.


Monday, November 11, 2013

Our Town

Our Town
“Such a nice place to live and raise family”


Election Day, 2013, has come and gone and now is the time for all the citizens of  Huntington Township to come together, hold hands, and sing “koom-by-ya”. If you believe that, I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn (real cheap).


*        “The Town of Huntington is located in northwestern Suffolk County, New York. The Long Island Sound forms         its northern border, and Nassau County forms the western border. Huntington was named an All-America City in 2002 by the National Civic League.” [1]
*        “The 2010 census indicates that the population of the town is 203, 264. A 2007 estimate indicates that the median income for a household in Huntington was $102,865. The population of Huntington is predominantly young, with over 60% of resident being under the age of 45.” [1]
Villages in the Town of Huntington [1]
·         Asharoken
·         Huntington Bay
·         Lloyd Harbor
·         Northport
 Hamlets in the Town of Huntington [1]
·      Centerport
·      Cold Spring Harbor
·      Commack
·      Dix Hills
·      East Northport
·         Eatons Neck
·         Elwood
·         Fort Salonga
·         Greenlawn
·         Halesite
·         Huntington Station
·         Huntington
·         Melville
·         South Huntington
·         West Hills
                               



It isn’t rocket science to figure out that we live in one of the more affluent areas of the entire Country. Say you assumed an average household of four (4) people that would give you approximately 50,800 total households in Huntington Township. With a total of $102,865.00 a year per household, we are looking at a very large number from which the Town draws its revenues:
            $5,225,542,000.00………………………………………..over 5 billion dollars.
            The Town’s budget for 2014 is $185,200,000.00……close to 200 million.
So, the Town needs about 3.5% of our earnings to function. Why is it then that in a working class neighborhood we are paying almost double (x2) that percentage in Real Estate Taxes to the Town of Huntington Tax Collector? And, guess what? We haven’t even touched all the other revenue streams that the Town relies on; permits & fees, business taxes, State & Federal Funding, etc. We’re not talking highs and lows. We’re talking middle class, average, median income levels per household. It is very apparent that our Town’s tax code has gotten so far out of hand that we are paying an exorbitant amount of money for a set of basic services. Does anyone in this Town ever take even a cursory glance at their Tax Bill? By the way this Town votes every Election Day, I would have to reach the conclusion that only a very few of us know how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide. And, most of those who do seem to end up behind closed doors at Town Hall making deals and spending money that we citizens simply don’t have.

Take a look at the “Referendum” voting from last week. If you actually read these, you would see the length to which our elected officials will go to keep their hands in your wallet.
“1. Do we want casinos?
                        Yes: 1,408,845 | No: 1,052,724 [2]
            2. Do we give disabled veterans additional civil service credit after they have been    
      appointed to a civil service position?
                        Yes: 1,931,932 | No: 377,972 [2]
            3. For the next ten (10) years, do we want to keep the debt from sewer systems out of
     the Town borrowing cap?
                        Yes: 1,331,389 | No: 808,552 [2]
            4. Do we want to litigate a bunch of old, disputed land titles in the Adirondacks?
                        Yes: 1,543,486 | No: 587,456 [2]
            5. Do we want to let NYCO Minerals rights to mine another 200 acres upstate?
                        Yes: 1,128,067 | No: 995,656 [2]
            6. Do we want to let Judges serve until they are eighty (80) years old?
                        Yes: 911,503 | No: 1,407,189 [2]
            7. Do we want to let municipal fire districts, ambulance districts, police districts and
                library districts to expand on Town owned property?
                        Yes: 105,020 | No: 58,143” [2]

A majority of these outcomes should be at least a little troubling to the tax payers in this Town. Do we want casinos? Yes, it would be nice to keep a chunk of our gambling dollars here in New York, but don’t believe for a moment that the revenue will go for education, as advertised. Do we want to give disabled veterans a bit of a break? Of course we do, and we should seriously consider doing a whole lot more for veterans. We certainly should be in favor of settling land ownership disputes in upstate New York, and this needs to be done with the Adirondack environment in mind.
Judges are up for mandatory retirement at the age of seventy (70) which is too old by at least ten (10) years, but, no, we don’t want to extend their retirement to eighty (80) years old. That’s a serious “WTF” proposal!

That brings us to #3, #5, and #7.  #3 allows the Town to discount any cost of borrowing for the sewer district from the normal accounting of the Town debt/borrowing cap. This, in effect, allows the Town to borrow more money in each category, thus spending more of the money none of us have. #5 deals with the immediate future of a chemical additive product company that has been allowed to strip-mine in the Adirondacks. It extends their reach into another two hundred (200) acres of pristine forest. Despite promises and contractual liabilities, strip-miming in upstate New York is a problem we can all do without. #7 is another very local, high impact proposition. The Town owns, or has the development rights to, some very attractive properties. By allowing this proposition to pass, we are telling the Town service agencies that they can tie these properties up with minimum stalling and legal tactics for decades. There may well come a time when other uses for these properties are a more definite benefit to the Town’s population. Why would we vote to hand complete and utter stewardship of this land over to our “behind closed doors” political structure?

With the aforementioned 50,800 total households in Huntington Township, we actually turned out a good number of voters last Tuesday; about 30%. Based on past numbers, this is not bad for an off-year election. With this number in attendance, I would have thought that reading might go hand-in-hand with mathematics, and we would finally come to our collective senses and stop the spending spree that the current, old administration gets away with year after year after year. Only the voters have a dog in this fight, and only voters can elect folks to Town positions who will act on our behalf. For too long now we have been hostage to the back room deals, the crony-ism, the behind closed doors, secret, weekend decision making that is going to bankrupt this place we call home. There are alternatives. Pick one, and go with it next time your mark your ballots.

Toe-notes:
            [1] Home  » Towns » Suffolk County » Huntington Township
                                 http://www.longisland.com/town-of-huntington.html

            [2] Statewide and county ballot referendums, originally published: October 17, 2013 3:42 PM
                                Updated: November 5, 2013 8:34 PM, By NEWSDAY STAFF

                                http://www.newsday.com/elections/statewide-and-county-ballot-referendums-1.6273587

Friday, April 5, 2013

Heads in the Sand






The out of touch world  

inside the Washington 

Beltway








The more I read about the U.S. Government’s view on what happened to the Economy in 2008, the more I am convinced that there is a rather large Ostrich Farm located within the confines of the Washington, DC Beltway. The Beltway is the area inside the I-495 highway that circles the Nation’s Capital. Within this circle reside our federally elected officials and an enormous number of Government employees. These good folks seem to be of the mind that all is truly well with the Union; after all, the President told us it was back in January. I can understand a little of their “head-in-the-sand” mentality, but, come on. Someone there must watch the News, or C-Span, or some form of media that gives them some sense of where the American Public stands on issues as large as the Economy.

As I’m reading “Foreign Affairs” (Jan./Feb. Issue), I realize that the article I’m most interested in is written by an ex-U.S. Deputy Treasury Secretary. I figure that, now that he’s out of the political circus, he may actually be in touch with reality and make a rational argument for his theme, “The Fall and Rise of the West”. And, then I hit upon the excerpt below:

“While the grim effects of the 2008 financial crisis still resonate across the globe, the recession wasn't all bad:” [1]

“…the recession wasn’t all that bad..?.” If it was just a recession, perhaps it would not have been that bad, but we encountered a modern-day Depression: not a recession. Anyone who was paying attention will agree. A look at the real numbers will tell you right away that our Financial system, backed by our Corporate giants, brought this Country and the entire World to its knees. Since its inception in 2008, this Depression has effectively bankrupted the Economies of some heretofore stable Countries; Greece, Spain, Great Britain, Russia, Japan, the United States, and Mexico to mention a few.                                    
 “…the result is a U.S. economy poised to emerge stronger than it was before...” [1]
We have a “bought-and-paid-for” Congress that keeps trying to secure our National slide into the gutter. We have a large group of “higher moral” States that feel they, too, can run roughshod over the American Public. All this is fully supported by a relative handful of U.S. based multinational Companies, and their puppets in Washington, DC. If you doubt this for one second, I refer you to ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council.

Here are a few demographic numbers that will bear out an argument for Depression:
















BLS = U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics


Who would ever have thought that the Carter years saw the highest manufacturing employment years? (almost 20 million jobs) There are figures that some believe describe the true unemployment rates in the U.S. (the SGS Alternate) With the true unemployment figures alone, this statement is ridiculous.

                                           SGS = Shadow Government Statistics
                                                         http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts

Definition of an Economic Depression:
1. a decline in real GDP exceeding 10%, or
2. a recession lasting 2 or more years.















Still, none of our financial “leaders” have been indicted, stood trial, or gone to jail.

[1]    Roger C. Altman, Why America and Europe Will Emerge Stronger From the Financial Crisis
       Foreign Affairs Publication, Jan./Feb., 2013