Saturday, February 16, 2013

Support for small businesses falling short in BC

Posted by Felix on Friday, February 15, 2013 · 1 Comment

Conference to support local businesses in Vancouver does everything but

Brought to you by big business, local politicians, with support from Vancouver’s finest economic institutions comes another conference about local business that does not support it.

In response to the Vancouver Economic Commission’s post on their Facebook page advertising the local economy summit aimed at developing local businesses, I ask the question of just how useful these conferences really are for small-to-micro sized local businesses. With costs of just attending at $200, not to mention costs in time and other expenses: is this kind of development purely aimed at those with comfortable government salaries or larger ‘local’ businesses?

Hosted at the Westin Bayshore (not a local brand by far) and supposedly attended by “advocates from around North America, local government leaders, officials from across BC, and well-known economic development experts”, the list excludes the local business community entirely. You know, people that the event is supposed to support. Simultaneously, the event is failing to support local business as their conference is being hosted at an international hotel chain. How does the hosting of a conference to promote and, I would hope, support local businesses get hosted at a large international hotel chain?

We are witnessing the spending of local tax payer money through the attendance of BC government officials on a taxpayer salary and they are excluding the small underfunded businesses that would most benefit from such exposure and networking.

Seeing this lavish use of local tax money to effectively pat each other on their backs while ignoring the real issue of growing local businesses begs the question; what does the government really do to support small businesses?

The government does little but pander to big business with such broad economic policies as the BC Jobs Plan and fails miserably in addressing the issues of small businesses. Small Business, the main source of new jobs, as opposed to big business who are cutting staff to remain LEAN.

Discussions of tax regulations and other macro level solutions that are of little value to the start-up entrepreneur who would find more value in good connections and accessible opportunities are all too common

Furthermore, the BC Jobs Plan that aims to create jobs does little more than add fundinginto an already bloated public education system. A system that already produces more graduates than jobs in many sectors and does little to create new businesses in the province. The additional funding into education seems as mindless as the failure to recognize local businesses.

The BC government and other organizations supposedly trying to support local business or create jobs in the province fail to understand the fundamental building blocks required for small entrepreneurs to succeed. With the exception of companies like Lulu Lemon, or the Jim Pattison group, most jobs are either directly in our government or lost to international competition supported by the same government.

Failing to bring entrepreneurs attainable and realistic opportunities or providing them with the tools and knowledge to create them, the government cannot hope to create new jobs in the economy. Likewise, investing further funds into an education system that is not known for producing entrepreneurs so desperately needed by the local economy will have little effect.

 

 

One Comment on “Support for small businesses falling short in BC”


This event peels the cover off the reason that the entire North American Continent is in for a really big surprise in the next six to eight years. Public money is being pushed into middle and higher education in an “effort to compete in the World Economy”. What we have here is the quintessential “chicken, or the egg” question. What we will be left with is a glut of B.A.’s, M.A.’s and PhD’s looking for non-existent jobs. Your “conference” in Vancouver is nothing more than the 1% trying to decide on what feel good story they are going to tell the 99%. Major problem #1: the Public (99%) swallows this garbage hook, line, and sinker. Wake up, folks! You are not being sold down the river; you are already there, just waiting to be loaded onto the ships. You are allowing History to repeat itself. You are fast becoming slaves to the ruling class. Stand up before it’s too late! REVOLUTION, NOW!

 

Comment #19


Letter to the Editor from Huntington Highway Superintendent William Naughton

By Village Tattler, on February 10th, 2013

Bridge and Tunnel Authority trucks arrive at Huntington Highways’ Elwood facility to assist in clearing the roads.

We have just experienced the worst possible scenario with regard to a winter storm. On Friday, it started off raining and quickly changed over to a record 29-inch snowfall. Because of the rain all roads ended up with a thick layer of ice under the snow.

Our primary method of snow removal has always been using local contractors in small 6 wheel dump trucks or pickup trucks. These trucks have had a very hard time plowing the snow because it is heavy and there is a layer of ice under it. The trucks lose traction and are getting stuck. Because of their frustration with getting stuck and damage to equipment, many of them have left service.

Due to the ice our own equipment has become stuck and some of it has been damaged. Yesterday we reached out to Supervisor Frank Petrone and State and County Emergency Management officials to request heavy equipment like payloaders, 10 wheel dump trucks, backhoes, etc. Some of these requests are starting to be filled. We would like to thank these agencies for helping us out in this trying time.

We are operating today with 100 less contractor pieces of equipment than we had yesterday but please be assured that we will not stop until every road is open to traffic.

We appreciate your patience.

Comment #19 to

“Letter to the Editor from Huntington Highway

Superintendent William Naughton”

·         Hutch

When the snow starts falling, there are a number of things that should already have happened and a number of things that should be happening throughout the snowfall. #1: All snowplow drivers, private and public, should certainly know how to plow snow. If they don’t, they need some education on the topic (not costly, or time consuming). If it becomes evident that a driver/operator cannot grasp the art of snow plowing, they should not work for the Town, in any capacity. #2: All public snow removal equipment needs to be staged in appropriate areas as to realize their maximum benefit. #3: If 18″-30″ of snow is expected, all plows must be in operation no later than 6″-8″ into the storm. Most plows are not designed to handle more than 8″ of slush and/or wet snow. #4: It is no secret that both the Town and private contractors own and operate Front-end Loaders, Backhoes, and Bobcat style loaders. All these assets need to be brought into the mix, especially in the village where there is a necessity to get rid of the snow, not simply plow it into mounds. If a private contractor refuses to use these assets under his ownership, they need to be terminated from Town contracts. #5: If the Superintendent of Highways cannot manage a simple snow storm, perhaps it is time to reconsider his tenure as an employee of the Town of Huntington (ref. Brookhaven). Lastly, in a town the size of Huntington, there is absolutely no rhyme or reason for the tax-payers to put up with, or accept, this type of performance from the people we elect to run our government. It seems that most of our public officials in the Town of Huntington have been with us for quite some time; if it’s time for a change, let’s not only demand it, but exercise our vote to bring that change to fruition.

 

Letter to Editor

Letter to Editor                                                                                 sent: 5/11/2012

NY Times

 

ref.:       Easy Useless Economics

                by Paul Krugman

 

subject:                                kudos to Mr. Krugman

 

   This is the first article I have read in a long time that states, directly, the simple reasons why our economy is in the tank, and is likely to stay that way, if the folks involved keep sitting on their hands. Mr. Krugman is willing to say what no one else dares to: “So now we’re in another depression, not as bad as the last one, but bad enough.” He also comes right out and points to the main element that brought us back from the “Great Depression”- a World War. Moreover, those, for the “nay-sayers”, involved massive amounts of taxpayer money to kick start our Economy, albeit a War Economy.

   Due to our modern day depressed Economy, and our collective distaste for another War, the previous option is not realistically feasible. The one avenue that seems to make a great deal of sense, right now, is a massive Government investment towards our National infrastructure. If we are to “throw” money at the problem, let’s toss it in the right direction, and get our money’s worth. Mr. Krugman, please keep this train of thought in the public‘s face until government action is taken.

 

{word count = 211}

 

 

Short Bio: Hutch Dubosque is a retired

Manufacturing Engineer who currently

writes on Socio-Political issues

Who's keeping score?


Interesting time line:

WW II             1941-1945   4 years

Cold War         1949-1984   35 years

Korea             1952-pres.   61 years(ongoing-no end in sight)

Viet Nam         1956-1975   19 years

Beirut              1982-1984   2 years

Desert Storm  1992           3 months

OEF                2001-pres.   13 years(ongoing -2014 projected)

OIF                 2002-2010   8 years

 

Now put them in descending order:

Korea            1952-pres.    61 years(ongoing-no end in sight)

Cold War        1949-1984            35 years

Viet Nam        1956-1975            19 years

OEF               2001-pres.    13 years(ongoing -2014 projected)

OIF                2002-2010            8 years

WW II            1941-1945            4 years

Beirut             1982-1984            2 years

Desert Storm 1992                      3 months

 

So, when anyone tells you that the war in Afghanistan is this Country’s longest, you can get in their face with some facts. The war in Afghanistan is certainly one of our longest and most bloody; it just isn’t at the top of the list, yet.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

In search of identity through Foreign Policy

Friday, February 08, 2013

There are researchers and scholars that who will state that our Nation’s Foreign Policies came of age after the Cold War. While there were some very significant Foreign Policy outcomes spawned at the end of the Cold War, our Nation’s modern day Policies were birthed at the end of World War II. Between 1945 and 1949, the United States of America had absolutely no qualms about the direction of its International and Foreign Policies. The dawn of the Nuclear Age brought about a sense of paranoia that would inevitably drive The United States into ways of thinking that came out looking a lot like Colonialism and/or expansionism. The Nation was slipping quickly into exactly the type of Country it had revolted against less than two hundred years earlier.

As Communism and Capitalism banged heads throughout the Cold War, Capitalism eventually came out on top as witnessed by the demise of the Soviet Union. There was, however, a very large menace to Capitalism that had not been corralled by the end of the Cold War. China sat by, apparently trying to stay under everyone’s radar. Oddly enough, it was China, not the Soviet Union, which drove the United States effort against the “Domino Theory” in Southeast Asia during the height of the Cold War. If there is one positive aspect of the Viet Nam War, it was indeed the fact that China could no longer annex the Indo-China Peninsula. As a result, the power brokers, the shadow “movers and shakers”, in the United States were sincere in their beliefs that the Viet Nam War was a success. It was this feeling of omnipotence that then drove the ensuing Foreign Policy of the United States. As an aside, it also drove the Military/Industrial Complex to heights never before imagined.

Where this has led the Nation through the 1970’s to present is to an overriding confidence that the rest of the World wants to be just like the United States. After all, are not immigrants tripping over one another to get into this Country in search of the “American Dream”? The question needs to be asked; what exactly is the “American Dream”? Apparently, there are two very separate “Dreams”. There is one for the proletariat, which is the one we all have had drilled into our heads since we were born. However, behind the scenes, there is another “Dream”. It is the dark, sinister, behind-the-shadows “Dream” that centers on the belief that the United States of America is the true way and that American ideals and practices should be shared with everyone; should be forced on everyone, if necessary. You think not? Just step back and take a look at our Nation’s recent History in its dealings with other sovereign Nations around the planet. Take a good look at Palestine, Bosnia, Serbia, Lebanon, Egypt, Libya, Myanmar, and Indonesia. Take a good, long skeptical look at World events as they have unfolded in recent years. You do not have to read between the lines to see what the United States is up to.

Those two words, Expansionism and Colonialism, keep rearing their ugly heads. It is time for a change: just not the one that has been crammed down our throats. It is improbable that all our History books would be rewritten. It is more probable that the power of Social Media will set this all straight, without cloak and dagger, smoke and mirrors, and lies upon lies. In the face of reality, the Citizens of the United States of America may entertain a dose of the truth about who and what runs their lives, the life of the Nation and, through expansionism, the life of the Planet.