Showing posts with label New Republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Republicans. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

THROWING GOOD MONEY AFTER BAD

The death knell of democracy
The place said to be the origin of Man will also see the death of Man. Why nobody is looking at this little problem we like to call the Mideast and Persia is a complete mystery to me. The beginning of the end started with the overthrow of the Shah of Iran in 1978. That was a debacle that thoroughly embarrassed the United States, and has led to a constant stream of overt and covert missions to retrieve the face we lost. Our presence in the Mideast has nothing to do with oil. It has nothing to do with nation building, or democracy. It has everything to do with revenge. The United States Government is Hell bent on turning the Mideast upside-down and inside-out for taking over our Embassy in Tehran and holding most of the Staff hostage for a year and a half.

There has always been talk of America’s envy of Mideast oil. The word on the street after freeing Kuwait was that the U.S. would benefit by receiving more oil at a lower price. That didn’t happen, did it? So, we went back and took down Iraq with the promise that Iraqi oil would completely pay for our military expedition. That didn’t quite happen either, did it? 
I suppose that our incursion into Afghanistan will be paid for by the opium production that is alive and well in that Country. Well, you know that isn’t going to happen.
Has anyone ever thought about just how much money the United States has dropped in this Region? I did a little looking into that question, and the numbers might keep you up at night. How does $6,509,500,000.00[1] sound [$6.510 trillion] since 1980? That’s a lot of Doe-Ray-Me, if you know what I mean. This money is given freely to Countries whose citizens have an annual per capita income of $500.00 dollars (if that).I won’t even begin to tell you what we could have done with that money here at home. If you ponder the situation for a while, you’ll come up with some pretty good ideas of your own.
Obviously, there is nothing we can do about all this spilled milk. That milk is firmly entrenched in the bank accounts of every Sheikh who ever rode a camel, or drove a Rolls Royce. It’s all tucked away in places nobody, especially us, can get at. So kiss it goodbye; chalk it up to experience, and hope we don’t keep doing the same thing decade in and decade out. Oh, but wait, we are doing the same thing, even as I write this. You see, the American political thought process is totally devoid of one thing; thought. We the people keep electing morons to do our biding. These morons are easily spun around and paid off by those lovely 1%-ers we have all grown to admire so much. What are they paid off to do? You guessed it! Our elected officials are paid to do the biding of their financial benefactors who, for the most part, own most of the Nation’s wealth, and intend to own it all in the not so distant future.

You may ask, “Why would anyone, in their right mind, want to tell our government to pour all those trillions of taxpayers’ dollars into an obvious “money pit’ in the Mideast?” The answer is fairly simple and is becoming clearer every day. If the 1% get the 99% to throw their money away, then the 99% won’t have any money left. When this happens, our Federal, State and Local governments go belly up, as in bankrupt, for lack of a tax base. Meanwhile, the 1% is skimming off the top of all these tax dollars and hoarding cash offshore in tax havens. When the time comes, and it will, the 1% will buy this Country back for pennies on the dollar. Don’t worry about Sharia Law blanketing the Nation, or the Western World, for that matter. The only religion will be that of the corporation. The only way to put bread on your table will be to cow-tow to the corporation. In essence, the corporation will attempt to rule the World, but not until another one of our military expeditions has been undertaken to avenge those poor souls who had to endure captivity in the heat and sweat of Iran.
The end result of this will most likely be Armageddon. In its attempt to find the face it lost in 1978, the United States will find itself staring down the barrels of the Russian and the Chinese Military, and this time someone will blink.



[1]$409.5 billion / 1980-2010 in foreign aid; $3.7 trillion for three major military efforts and $1.6 trillion for five minor military efforts / $800 billion for logistical aid to Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan in their little skirmishes. [Huffington Post, Forbes Magazine, U.S. State Department, Government Accounting Office, Rand Corp.]

Friday, November 23, 2012

Jumping off the Cliff

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/grover-norquist/fiscal-cliff_b_2173978.html

Commentary follows the hi-lighted footnotes.


President, Americans for Tax Reform

Two Thoughts on Navigating the "Fiscal Cliff"

Posted: 11/21/2012 5:46 pm

On January 1, 2013 three things happen:

First, the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts lapse along with a number of temporary tax reductions that have been extended so many times they are collectively known as "the extenders." (Note to self: possible name for female rock band.)[1]  This collection of tax hikes total $500 billion in 2013. The $1,000 per child tax credit drops to $500. The Obama Social Security tax holiday ends again. The bottom tax rate jumps from 10 percent to 15 percent and the top personal income tax rate jumps from 35 to 39.6 percent -- plus Obamacare's new 3.8 percent surtax: total for top rate 43.4%. (Do be sure to add 10.3 percent for the state income tax if you live in California, 5.75 percent in Maryland or 8.82 percent in New York.)

And unless changed, the AMT will hit 30 million families, up from 4 million last year.[2]  The AMT was originally created as the quintessential "tax on the rich" targeting all of 155 people.[3]

Second, the "sequestration" or automatic spending reductions of about $100 billion a year for ten years. This will save taxpayers $1.2 trillion over the decade and was part of the Budget Control Act (BCA) that Obama and Boehner agreed to in 2011 to "pay for" the debt ceiling increase.[4]

Third, the surtax on income of 2.9 percent rises to 3.8 percent and starting January 1, 2013 it hits capital gains making the total top rate not today's 15 percent, not Bill Clinton's 20 percent, but 23.8 percent. The top rate on dividends increases from today's 15 percent to not just 35 or 39.6 percent, but 43.4 percent total. (And then add state and local income taxes.)[5]

Obama would like to have a "grand bargain" -- as in 1982 or 1990 -- where Republicans were promised they would get three or two dollars of spending reduction for every dollar of tax increase. (The tax hikes were real and permanent and spending was not cut but actually rose from baseline.) Reagan said 1982 was his greatest mistake. His second biggest mistake learned nothing and agreed in 1990 to "two imaginary dollars" of spending cuts for each dollar of tax hike.[6]

How can Americans protect themselves against being TARPed again? This new verb is a favorite of congressmen and senators who feel they were rushed to vote for the Troubled Assets Relief Program the way a sleazy salesman urges you to buy the aluminum siding NOW without bothering your pretty little head with reading the contract.[7]

There are two protections available to the American people:

First, we can and should demand that the negotiations between Congress and the White House on continuing the various "Bush" tax cuts be done in front of C-SPAN cameras. No more secret negotiations. Open covenants, openly arrived at. Every American -- not just PHARMA and the insurance companies -- should be in the room when something as large as Obamacare or today's $500 billion tax hike is under discussion.[8]

Republicans should promise not to be snarky and must resist the temptation to remind Americans that C-SPAN coverage of such talks was one of Obama's key promises in 2008. Oh, well. Better late than never.[9]

C-SPAN cameras will allow Americans to know who is being reasonable and who is not. Who presents real solutions and who repeats talking points. If Republicans demand the negotiations be covered by C-SPAN and Obama refuses -- then we would know, as King Solomon did -- who is acting in good faith and who is not. Perhaps Obama is dealing from the top of the deck and he will demand C-SPAN start-to-finish coverage.

Second, once a "deal" is agreed to, it should be written down in legislative language and put online for every American to read for seven full days: 168 hours. No rushing tired congressmen before cameras to endorse legislation they have not read because it only exists in outline form in someone else's briefcase.[10]

If going into these "fiscal cliff" negotiations every participant knows that both his private and public statements will be heard by all Americans and that the final work product must stand the test of being read by citizens, the chance of another 1982 or 1990 or TARP 2008 will be greatly reduced.[11] Risk can rarely be taken to zero. But the ability of the American people to watch the sausage made and read the contract before signing is a better guardian of our future than the hurried endorsements of the Washington establishment based on private assurances of politicians.[12]

Commentary from the desk of We The Peeps1:
From the man who was to propel the GOP into the White House and gain control of the U.S. Senate, here is an article by Grover Norquist. Read with a careful eye and a smattering of history, this article seems to signal a sea change in the behind the scenes maneuvering in the Republican Party. If, indeed, Norquist is a “shaker and mover” in the GOP, what we have here is an “about face” in rhetoric, at the very least.
Based on the hi-lighted footnotes I placed throughout the article, we need to straighten a few things out:
[1]    ...."the extenders." (Note to self: possible name for female rock  
          band.)    
          Haven’t the folks of the Republican Party figured out that there are more women
              voters than  
              men? When do they intend to stop their verbal and fiscal assault on the women of
              this  Country?

[2]    ...30 million families, up from 4 million last year.
         Did anyone send the memo to dear little Grover that the Affordable Health Care Act
            kicked in this year, with more to come in 2013 & 2014? This increase is a calculated
            and known increase due precisely to that Act. This is a qouting of fact that has
            absolutely no bearing on our fiscal
            woes, at the moment.
[3]    ...targeting all of 155 people.
        This number is misleading, if you don’t put it in context. It is a number from 1980
            and the Reagan years. As of 2012, there are vastly more “Millionaires” than there
            were way back then.
[4]    ...Budget Control Act (BCA) that Obama and Boehner agreed to in
        2011...  
        To include a statement like this one is totally meaningless. It has no relevance
           whatsoever to any argument Grover could pose.
[5]    ...increases from today's 15 percent to not just 35 or 39.6 percent,
         but 43.4 percent...
         This is what they are complaining about?  How about asking the elder Senators and
            Representatives what their Fathers and Grandfathers paid in taxes for Capital Gains
            and Dividends? Those figures reached up to 90%, in some cases.
[6]    ..."two imaginary dollars" of spending cuts for each dollar of tax
         hike....
         Well, there you go, again. Trashing Ronnie for a few “minor” little mistakes he made
             in his vision of fiscal integrity for this Nation. OOOPS!
[7]    ...congressmen and senators who feel they were rushed to vote
         for the Troubled Assets Relief Program the way a sleazy
         salesman.......
            And, why was it that they were “rushed”? The Republican filibuster in the Senate
            caused the Bill to get backed into a corner at the Eleventh hour. The “sleazy
            salesmen” were your boys, Grover.
[8]    ...done in front of C-SPAN cameras. No more secret negotiations.
         Um...Mr. Norquist, do you think any of your puppets would ever agree to be live on
            camera, and doing the Nation’s business? You really do think that we’ve all lost our
            ability to remember just how infantile your Congressional Lemmings really are.
            Really? Cameras? Live?

[9]    ...Oh, well. Better late than never...
         Do I hear Grover coming over to President Obama’s point of view? Ladies and
            Gentlemen, we have a flip-flop!
[10]   ...and put online for every American to read for seven full days....
         I don’t know about your tired, overworked Congressmen and Senators, but the
            American People could very easily read these documents, front to back, at least twice
            in the given time frame. And, after all, isn’t transparency a Democratic issue?
[11]   ...the chance of another 1982 or 1990 or TARP 2008 will be
         greatly reduced...
         I’m actually beginning to think Grover is a Democrat, or, at least, a centrist and a
            moderate.
[12]   ...the ability of the American people to watch the sausage made
         and...
         So, according to Grover Norquist, our National Legislation is akin to a sausage? I
            hope this mislead, unfortunate man gets off the bus at the very next stop. The
           American People have endured enough of this oral diarrhea, and its time to clean up
           our ride into 2013 and beyond.